-----Original Message----- > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com] > > Il 22/03/2012 01:23, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto: > > Actually, I also see some failures during testing. And most of them > > are fail to pass the 244us update cycle checking. Since we are in > > emulation environment, we cannot ensure it always greater than 244us. > > So I think it should not be a bug. > > Yes, that's fine. But I also see some cases in which the first upgrade > cycle after divider reset is not reported. The second, 1.5 seconds > after divider reset, is fine. I think your patch can fix it. Right?
Best regards yang
