Il 22/03/2012 01:23, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto: > Actually, I also see some failures during testing. And most of them > are fail to pass the 244us update cycle checking. Since we are in > emulation environment, we cannot ensure it always greater than 244us. > So I think it should not be a bug.
Yes, that's fine. But I also see some cases in which the first upgrade cycle after divider reset is not reported. The second, 1.5 seconds after divider reset, is fine. Paolo
