Il 22/03/2012 01:23, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto:
> Actually, I also see some failures during testing. And most of them
> are fail to pass the 244us update cycle checking. Since we are in
> emulation environment, we cannot ensure it always greater than 244us.
> So I think it should not be a bug.

Yes, that's fine.  But I also see some cases in which the first upgrade
cycle after divider reset is not reported.  The second, 1.5 seconds
after divider reset, is fine.

Paolo

Reply via email to