On 22/04/2024 19:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 22/4/24 17:52, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF wrote:
>> The 'level' field in vtd_iotlb_key is an uint8_t.
>> We don't need to store level as an int in vtd_lookup_iotlb
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Clément Mathieu--Drif <clement.mathieu--d...@eviden.com>
>> ---
>>   hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> index 6f1364b3fd..ba545590b1 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static VTDIOTLBEntry 
>> *vtd_lookup_iotlb(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint16_t source_id,
>>   {
>>       struct vtd_iotlb_key key;
>>       VTDIOTLBEntry *entry;
>> -    int level;
>> +    uint8_t level;
>
> Or simply 'unsigned' up to vtd_slpt_level_shift()?
vtd_iotlb_key.level is an uint8_t, just avoiding a warning here

Reply via email to