Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joachim Henke wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 10:51 +0200, Juergen Keil wrote: >> > Isn't the use of "which" wrong, anyway? >> > >> > "which" belongs to csh/tcsh, and tells you about csh's/tcsh's idea >> > about a command or a csh command alias. >> > >> > IMO, for a /bin/sh (or bash) script, using the "type" command would >> > be a better idea. >> >> Yes, 'which' is not reliable. > > "type" appears to be bash-specific, at least according to the bash > documentation, so I stuck with "which" for now.
You could use "command -v" from SUSv3. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org
