Am 15.03.2012 09:32, schrieb Alexander Graf:
>
> On 15.03.2012, at 01:11, Michael Roth <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:01:04AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> My GCC handles the following code fine:
>>>
>>> typedef struct CPULM32State CPULM32State;
>>>
>>> typedef struct CPULM32State {
>>> // ...
>>> } CPULM32State;
>>>
>>> Solutions would be to
>>> a) drop the second typedef,
>>> b) use struct CPULM32State,
>>> c) move the function using it to after the second typedef.
>>
>> I vote for a)
>
> Same here.
Long fixed. :) Wait, you haven't actually been sleeping at night this
once? ;)
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
