Hi Philippe, On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:02:52PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:02:52 +0100 > From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> > Subject: [PATCH 01/21] hw/i386/pc: Do not use C99 mixed-declarations style > X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 > > QEMU's coding style generally forbids C99 mixed declarations. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> > --- > hw/i386/pc.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c > index 196827531a..3c00a87317 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/pc.c > +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c > @@ -1227,6 +1227,7 @@ void pc_basic_device_init(struct PCMachineState *pcms, > */ > if (pcms->hpet_enabled) { > qemu_irq rtc_irq; > + uint8_t compat; > > hpet = qdev_try_new(TYPE_HPET); > if (!hpet) { > @@ -1238,8 +1239,7 @@ void pc_basic_device_init(struct PCMachineState *pcms, > * use IRQ16~23, IRQ8 and IRQ2. If the user has already set > * the property, use whatever mask they specified. > */ > - uint8_t compat = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(hpet), > - HPET_INTCAP, NULL); > + compat = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(hpet), HPET_INTCAP, NULL); > if (!compat) { > qdev_prop_set_uint32(hpet, HPET_INTCAP, hpet_irqs); > }
"compat" is only used here to check. So, what about getting rid of this variable? if (!object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(hpet), HPET_INTCAP, NULL)) { qdev_prop_set_uint32(hpet, HPET_INTCAP, hpet_irqs); }