On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 16:23 +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> We don't currently document the syntax of .hx files anywhere
> except in a few comments at the top of individual .hx files.
> We don't even have somewhere in the developer docs where we
> could do this.
> 
> Add a new files docs/devel/docs.rst which can be a place to
> document how our docs build process works. For the moment,
> put in only a brief introductory paragraph and the documentation
> of the .hx files. We could later add to this file by for
> example describing how the QAPI-schema-to-docs process works,
> or anything else that developers might need to know about
> how to add documentation.
> 
> Make the .hx files refer to this doc file, and clean
> up their header comments to be more accurate for the
> usage in each file and less cut-n-pasted.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: David Woodhouse <d...@amazon.co.uk>

> ---
> My motivation here is that we're about to add support for
> extending the SRST directive to specify a label so we
> can hyperlink to a documentation fragment; this gives us
> somewhere we can document the syntax for that.

Thank you.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to