On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 11:22 +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote: > On Oct 25 11:14, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > > It seems that the "at24c-eeprom" model doesn't have a maintainer. Until > > this is sorted out, may be this change could go through the NVMe queue > > since it is related. > > > > I can, but I'm not that confident on determining if we choose to > implement this behavior broadly. I have no qualms, but someone who works > more with embedded stuff might?
What are the feelings on putting the behaviour behind a flag? We could add it as a property that we can set, e.g. when defining a machine. Andrew
