Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 05 April 2007, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > > > Was incorrect before too, since it was sizeof(int) in the first place ? > > > > The old type of "val" was "int", so it made no different to the size. > > When "val" is of type socklen_t, it matters. > > val is still of type int which is fine ... socklen_t is for the variable > which > describes the length of val
Yes, thanks for pointing it out. -- Jamie
