Stuart Anderson wrote: > > Even though clone() and fork() are related, they don't seem to be close > enough to allow a single routine to be used to implement both. With this > patch, the LTP tests for clone now pass.
But it still does the same, assuming VM_CLONE is set, except for passing additional arguments to the host call. Passing untranslated regs looks like a bug to me, I'm unsure about the tls_val. > It may be possible to fold this back into do_fork(), but this just seemed to > be a little bit more straightforward. Since Linux's fork() is just a specialcase of clone() this should be done eventually. Thiemo
