On 26/03/07, andrzej zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,On 21/03/07, Todd T. Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is relative to the 20070319 snapshot. > > --- cpu-all.h.orig Fri Mar 16 18:58:11 2007 > +++ cpu-all.h Tue Mar 20 21:14:10 2007 > @@ -1012,13 +1012,22 @@ static inline int64_t cpu_get_real_ticks > #endif > } > #else > -/* The host CPU doesn't have an easily accessible cycle counter. > - Just return a monotonically increasing vlue. This will be totally wrong, > - but hopefully better than nothing. */ > +# warning non-optimized CPU > +#include <sys/time.h> > +#include <time.h> > + > static inline int64_t cpu_get_real_ticks (void) > { > - static int64_t ticks = 0; > - return ticks++; > + struct timeval tv; > + static int64_t i = 0; > + int64_t j; > + > + gettimeofday(&tv, NULL); > + do { > + j = (tv.tv_sec * (uint64_t) 1000000) + tv.tv_usec; > + } while (i == j); > + i = j; > + return j; Isn't this an infinite loop? gettimeofday() was left out of the loop. How about "return j + (ticks++)" instead of the loop? If I understand correctly it may slow things down to below 1Hz.
(I wanted to say MHz)
> } > #endif > > -- > Todd Fries .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _____________________________________________ > | \ 1.636.410.0632 (voice) > | Free Daemon Consulting, LLC \ 1.405.227.9094 (voice) > | http://FreeDaemonConsulting.com \ 1.866.792.3418 (FAX) > | "..in support of free software solutions." \ 250797 (FWD) > | \ > \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ > > 37E7 D3EB 74D0 8D66 A68D B866 0326 204E 3F42 004A > http://todd.fries.net/pgp.txt > > > > Regards, Andrew
