I disagree. /bin/sh makes a very flexible config file format that I
use. I use it on win32, Linux and Mac OS X.
I would prefer that you write another cross platform shell, than
another config file. At least that way I could use the same config
tool for more than one application.
Everytime this comes up, do I have to disagree again, so that my
voice is not lost?
Any yes, adding features that I do not use increases the complexity
and decreases the stability of the features I do use, so it would
effect me. I have the same feeling about embedding VNC
authentication, the samba server, etc.
Joe
On Mar 2, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Paul Brook wrote:
There's also no reason to limit to 7 disks, and we should
support scsi
cdroms.
The reason for 7 is the number of available id on the scsi bus.
For wide scsi it is 15.
I wouldn't bet on wide scsi working.
For PCI based systems you can add more host adapters to get more
devices. I haven't actually tested this, but it should work.
I think most people agree that we need a config file. I haven't
seen any comments on my config file patch though.
So, any comments on that patch? Any requirements on a format?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Paul
_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
