On Thursday 22 March 2007 23:57, Julian Seward wrote: > On Thursday 22 March 2007 23:27, Paul Brook wrote: > > > Do you mean you're asking me to break up Paul Brook's QOPS tree at > > > https://nowt.dyndns.org and submit it to mainline? I can do this > > > thing, if you really think it would help. > > > > If you implement all the missing bits in the process it'll help ;-) > > What bits would they be then?
The m68k target is the only one that uses qops for all its code generation. Arm is about half-and-half, x86 has the easy bits converted, and the other targets still use dyngen pretty much exclusively. amd64 host support is fairly good, x86 hosts mostly work, and ppc has bitrotted a bit. > FWIW, I snarfed the patch last Sunday and tested it on amd64 host / > x86 guest, and successfully booted a couple of linux distros. So it's > not obviously broken, at least for my mundane host/guest choice. > It also seemed marginally slower on a big compile in the guest - > 395.4 host cpu seconds for mainline vs 422.9 with qops. Is this > expected? Yes. The generated code should run at similar speed, but doing the translation takes a bit longer. I've been seeing 10-20% slowdown for booting linux. Paul _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
