On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:28:26PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:36:06AM -0800, alex wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >--- /d/qemu/vl.c Fri Jan 12 10:43:12 2007
>> >+++ vl.c Fri Jan 12 10:49:37 2007
>> >@@ -2692,8 +2692,13 @@
>> > if (ret < 0) {
>> > err = socket_error();
>> > if (err == EINTR || err == EWOULDBLOCK) {
>> >+#ifndef _WIN32
>> > } else if (err == EINPROGRESS) {
>> > break;
>> >+#else
>> >+ } else if (err == EINPROGRESS | err == WSAEALREADY) {
>>
>> Doesn't sound like it would be correct ("|" != "||"), even for Windows..
>
>Well, it might be not intended, but it still works correctly: "==" has a
>higher priority than "|", and the value of "err == EINPROGRESS" is 0 or 1,
>depending on the value of EINPROGRESS. It is never anything else but 0 or
>1, so the operator "|" has the same result as "||" (at least in this
>case).
Your right, sorry for the noise.
_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
