Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4

[K. Richard Pixley]

Johannes Schindelin wrote: On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Rob Landley wrote: Basically, gcc changed in a way that broke qemu. Yes, they did. But even if I understand your frustration (which I share), I also understand the gcc people. After all, using gcc to create the blocks for dynamic translation is a _hack_. Yes, it is a hack.  And short of some guarantees from gcc, (which we don't have), it is destined to be an ongoing issue. The result of a compiler run, though, should work and run -- as fast as possible. So basically, the gcc people want to achieve a different goal from what we misuse their program for. Creating a qemu variant target for gcc would address both of these concerns.  It would introduce new ones, of course, but it would address these two. --rich

_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel