> > We already do that. It doesn't stop gcc putting the return in the middle
> > of the function.
> >
> > Paul
>
> void f1();
> void f2();
>
> void f(int *z, int x, int y)
> {
> if (x) {
> *z = x;
> f1();
> } else {
> *z = y;
> f2();
> }
> asm volatile ("");
> }
>
> works, with gcc -O2 -fno-reorder-blocks. removing either the asm or the
> -f flag doesn't. No idea if it's consistent across architectures.
It doesn't work reliably though. We already do everything you mention above.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
