Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Eric Hameleers wrote: > > >>What is the difference with the old RFB patch that the currently >>built-in VNC server handles differently? > > > The old RFB patch uses the infrastructure of LibVNCServer, which has been > tried and tested. > > Unfortunately, Anthony decided to fix the issue he had not by submitting a > patch to LibVNCServer, but by completely rewriting the functionality. So, > the old RFB patch and the built-in VNC server share only the goal. > > Ciao, > Dscho >
Hi Johannes Yes I know, and although the libvncserver based patch was cumbersome over high-latency connections it was still useful (and I was able to access the monitor). With Anthony's re-implementation I get great improvements regarding the screen refresh, but I have lost access to the monitor (so I have to use a separate telnet connection now) and most importantly, I cannot use my keyboard reliably which makes this implementation effectively useless to me. I guess I will have to look into the keymaps myself, but on first quick inspection I did not find anything out of order in the "nl" keymap. Eric -- Eric Hameleers RedHat Certified Engineer #808003505607683 Linux Knowledge Center, IBM Global Services Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel