Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Eric Hameleers wrote:
> 
> 
>>What is the difference with the old RFB patch that the currently 
>>built-in VNC server handles differently?
> 
> 
> The old RFB patch uses the infrastructure of LibVNCServer, which has been 
> tried and tested.
> 
> Unfortunately, Anthony decided to fix the issue he had not by submitting a 
> patch to LibVNCServer, but by completely rewriting the functionality. So, 
> the old RFB patch and the built-in VNC server share only the goal.
> 
> Ciao,
> Dscho
> 

Hi Johannes

Yes I know, and although the libvncserver based patch was cumbersome
over high-latency connections it was still useful (and I was able to
access the monitor). With Anthony's re-implementation I get great
improvements regarding the screen refresh, but I have lost access to
the monitor (so I have to use a separate telnet connection now) and
most importantly, I cannot use my keyboard reliably which makes this
implementation effectively useless to me.
I guess I will have to look into the keymaps myself, but on first
quick inspection I did not find anything out of order in the "nl" keymap.

Eric

-- 
Eric Hameleers
RedHat Certified Engineer #808003505607683
Linux Knowledge Center, IBM Global Services
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

Reply via email to