Hi, On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Auke Kok wrote:
> I do not think that kqemu benefits from being closed source, and probably more > people with me. People will pick an open implementation before any closed one, > even industry, they're picking up faster than you think ;^) > > I did not agree with kqemu being released without the proprietary flag, which > is why I submitted the issue, and,if I can help it, it'll be open source or > surpassed by something that is - no offense. This is BS. You are basically going into a restaurant and say: "I don't think that lovely steak benefits from having a price tag. I do not agree with having to pay for this steak, and if I can help it, it'll be for free." Think about it. Fabrice does a wonderful job. Guess who's paying him. Hth, Dscho _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
