> > There are a couple of interesting paravirtualization techniques too. > > There's the Xen approach (really fast, but very invasive), the L4ka > > afterburning (theoritically close to as fast, but less invasive), and > > then of course the extremes like UML. > > Not familar with L4ka. I don't believe that UML does virtualization, it > simply runs linux code 'as is' but intercepts calls to the kernel.
I don't want to put words in Anthony's mouth but I usually see UML as a rather (very) extreme case of paravirtualisation that barely preserves the underlying architecture's characteristics; I'm guessing that's what he meant... Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
