>Why not choose QEMU + QVM86, The QVM86 do same thing with accelerator >module, but it is Open Source Project.
Because at the moment, qvm86 doesn't work well. Still has bugs and limitations. And it actually seems to be *slower* than qemu without it. Or at least not much faster. That's based on the only Windows cvs build that had qvm86 with it. (Still available from the club-internet.fr Win daily build mirror.) I assume the linux build behaves the same, since it is based on the same core routines and techniques. That seems to be the impression I get from the qemu users forum, anyway. I'm sure it could be significantly improved, but at the moment there are only a couple people working occasionally on it. So it's not something you can depend on being vastly improved on in the next few weeks. (To be honest, I suspect that the qvm86 techniques didn't work as well as the author originally expected / hoped. Just my feeling.) _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
