On Friday 22 April 2005 17:12, Jonas Maebe wrote: > On 22 apr 2005, at 17:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello Jonas, here is the output of the command you gave me for this > > function, does this help ? > > It helps in the sense that it confirms my suspicion, although I don't > know why it creates such convoluted code. Maybe in order to have as > small code as possible with at the same time as many aligned jump > targets as possible. It's definitely not trivial to parse this, and > even less trivial to rewrite it so it is usable for qemu's purposes (in > this particular case, the retq could be replaced by a jmp, but you > can't count on there being 4 padding bytes after each ret). > > You (or someone else) will have to find a way to force gcc 4.0 to put > one ret (or jump) at the very end of the code it generates. If that's > not possible, it will be quite hard to support gcc 4.0 in qemu...
It's not possible to force gcc4 to put the "ret" at the end of the code. Paul _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
