Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> writes: > Postcopy never cared about late-block-active. However there's no mention > in the capability that it doesn't apply to postcopy. > > Considering that we _assumed_ late activation is always good, do that too > for postcopy unconditionally, just like precopy. After this patch, we > should have unified the behavior across all. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de>
