On 3 January 2013 17:29, Jon Ribbens <jon+python...@unequivocal.co.uk> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 05:13:57PM +0000, Michael Foord wrote: > > On 3 Jan 2013, at 17:07, Jon Ribbens <jon+python...@unequivocal.co.uk> > > wrote: > > > I don't want either of those options, I want the proper, standard > > > list behaviour, which is "Reply-To unchanged from the sender's email". > > > > However sincerely (and obstinately) you believe in the correctness > > of your desires, the mailing list exists to serve its users - not > > any notion of correctness. The majority of the subscribers who have > > expressed an opinion, either in this thread or the poll, prefer > > reply-to-list. > > > > FWIW on lists where reply-to goes to the individual I *very* > > regularly see messages accidentally sent only to the original sender > > and not to the list. This is regularly a (mild) impediment to > > communication. I very rarely see the opposite (public replies that > > were meant to be private). So the cure is largely worse than the > > disease. > > You are wrong. HTH.
No, he's not - he's absolutely correct when he says the mailing list exists to serve its users - not any notion of correctness. Michael. (noting it's clearly bike shed season) _______________________________________________ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
