---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Luke Faraone <lfara...@debian.org> Date: 23 August 2015 at 18:28 Subject: Django 1.8 transition To: "python-dja...@packages.debian.org" <python-dja...@packages.debian.org> Cc: Barry Warsaw <ba...@debian.org>, Raphaël Hertzog <hert...@debian.org>
Hi folks, I did a test rebuild of packages that depend on python-django under 1.7 (unstable)[1] and 1.8 (experimental)[2]. I filed bugs against the packages that FTBFS under the current version in unstable if there was not one opened already. Obviously a package build is not a full test, but it at least catches the most obvious breakages. 12 dependant packages are already broken under 1.7; 14 more packages will break under 1.8.[3] For 1.7, Raphael did a MBF on all reverse-dependencies. Do we want to do that again, or only for the ones where there was breakage? -- Luke Faraone [1]: https://people.debian.org/~lfaraone/notes/2015-django18/logs/1.7/ [2]: https://people.debian.org/~lfaraone/notes/2015-django18/logs/1.8/ [3]: https://people.debian.org/~lfaraone/notes/2015-django18/bad_packages-1.8.txt -- Luke Faraone;; Debian & Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs; MIT SIPB lfaraone on irc.[freenode,oftc].net -- https://luke.wf/ohhello PGP fprint: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
