Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Java is not an acronym. That is: it's "Java", not "JAVA". > > Now THAT was an important information RIGHT on topic.
It was not meant offensively. >> Java does not allow access to private members via reflection. > > For somebody nitpicking on natural language usage to a non-native > speaker, you show an impressive lack of knowledge in the actual subject > discussed. Again: It was not meant offensively. Maybe you can try turning the flames down a bit. > http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/11/12/reflection.html Does that approach work on sealed jars as well? I would imagine any jars that need any kind of "real" security would be sealed... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
