Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
>>> because lots of people know how to describe XML transformations, and
>>> there are plenty of tools that implement such transformations
>>> efficiently ?
>>
>>
>> Efficiently enough for dynamic (runtime) use ?
>
>
> Using XML-transformation for AST manipulation isn't my first choice
> either - yet efficiency concerns aren't really the point here - after
> all we're talking about generating code,
I thought we were talking about *transforming* code - just like one uses
metaclasses to transform a class definition, or @decorators to transform
a function definition...
(snip)
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
