Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: (snip) > I think you're taking Python's OO-ness too seriously. One of the > strengths of Python is that it can _look_ like an OO language without > actually being OO.
According to which definition of OO ?
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
