In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bruno at modulix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> bruno at modulix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>(snip) >>> >>>>I think you're taking Python's OO-ness too seriously. One of the >>>>strengths of Python is that it can _look_ like an OO language without >>>>actually being OO. >>> >>>According to which definition of OO ? >> >> Isn't there one? > >Your claim that Python "_look_ like an OO language without actually >being OO" implicitely relies on a definition of OO - or is just >meaningless. Which nicely evades answering the question. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
