Paul Rubin a écrit : > Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>And of course, I was right. My solution seems to be faster than Paul's >>one (but slower than bearophile's), be it on small, medium or large >>lists. >> >>nb: A is mine, B is Paul's and C is bearophile's, and the number after >>is the size of the list... > > > Interesting. I wonder if you could try it with a much larger number > of distinct values in the list.
Please do, this could be interesting... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
