[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ben Finney wrote: > > > The web content is a bit sparse; fortunately the code has seen more > > love than the web pages. Wax was the focus of a couple of Google > > "Summer of Code" projects, and new life seems to have been gained as a > > result. > > I'm glad to hear that, however, I just took a look at the mailing list: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9696120&forum_id=44351 > > """ > I am going to take a break from blogging and my personal > projects. This includes Wax. In other words, Wax development will be > on hold for a while. During this time, I might still address urgent > bugs and such, but I don't plan to add new features. > """ > > Things like this raise a bit of concern about the survivability of the > project. I wouldn't mind if it was a relatively independent component > but it *is* one that is heavily dependent on wxPython... >
Wax is certainly currently usable and not at all unstable. It has a small userbase, but it is used. I'm about to start a couple of projects with it. The code is relatively simple - so it would be easy to maintain the parts you use if that was necessary. Certainly easier than duplicating it yourself from scratch. :-) Once you start using Wax, it really is simple and friendly. All the best, Fuzzyman http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/index.shtml -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
