[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Fuzzyman wrote: > > > > > The code is relatively simple - so it would be easy to maintain the > > > parts you use if that was necessary. Certainly easier than duplicating > > > it yourself from scratch. :-) > > > > Sounds convincing, I'll give it a shot after all. > > Ok, after brief eyeballing & experimenting, it appears that Wax is just > what I was looking for. The code is simple, concise and trivially > understandable, the level of wrapping seems about right, and examples > are helpful. > > I'm glad I came whining about this in c.l.py instead of sucking it up > or switching toolkits altogether. :-)
That's good news. I'm about to start using Wax on a couple of small(ish) projects - so it's nice to know about other users. All the best, Fuzzyman http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/index.shtml -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
