Ravi Teja wrote: > This is a standard response to a rather frequent question here. But I > am not sure I ever understood. Scheme / Lisp are about as dynamic as > Python.
if that were fully true, it would be fairly trivial to translate Python to scheme or lisp and compile it. > Another standard response is "nobody felt the need or got around to > it". And yet a number of Lisp and Scheme compilers exist when these > languages have a much smaller user base. Am I missing something here? an endless supply of grad students ? </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
