Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Ravi Teja wrote: > > > This is a standard response to a rather frequent question here. But I > > am not sure I ever understood. Scheme / Lisp are about as dynamic as > > Python. > > if that were fully true, it would be fairly trivial to translate Python to > scheme or lisp and compile it.
I only dabble in Lisp / Scheme. I am curious on how Python is more dynamic. > > > Another standard response is "nobody felt the need or got around to > > it". And yet a number of Lisp and Scheme compilers exist when these > > languages have a much smaller user base. Am I missing something here? > > an endless supply of grad students ? :-). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
