Antoon Pardon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There is a use case for things like 1 < (1,3) making sense and denoting > a total order. When you have a hetergenous list, having a total order > makes it possible to sort the list which will make it easier to > weed out duplicates. So why don't you demand a use case for the > new behaviour to counter this use case?
This could easily be handled with an alternate comparison function that you pass to the sort function. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
