Magnus Lycka wrote: > The static typing means that you either have to make several > implementations of many algorithms, or you need to work with > those convoluted templates that were added to the language as > an afterthought. I don't see this in Haskell.
> While feature-by-feature comparisions of different > programming languages might have some merit, the only > thing that counts in the end is how the total package > works... I think you'll find that Python is a useful > package, and a good tool in a bigger tool chest. That is very true. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list