On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Bengt Richter wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:12:26 +0000, Tom Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--
ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø
[OT} (just taking liberties with your sig ;-)
,<@><
°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°P`°º¤ø,,y,,ø¤º°t`°º¤ø,,h,,ø¤º°o`°º¤ø,,n,,ø¤º°
The irony is that with my current news-reading setup, i see my own sig as
a row of question marks, seasoned with backticks and commas. Your
modification looks like it's adding a fish; maybe the question marks are a
kelp bed, which the fish is exploring for food.
Hmm. Maybe if i look at it through Google Groups ...
Aaah! Very good!
However, given the context, i think it should be:
,<OO><
°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°P`°º¤ø,,y,,ø¤º°t`°º¤ø,,h,,ø¤º°o`°º¤ø,,n,,ø¤º°
!
tom
--
limited to concepts that are meta, generic, abstract and philosophical --
IEEE SUO WG--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
