"David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But there is no law against that type of conduct, *unless* you are a > monopolist. So your conclusion hinges on the determination that Microsoft > had a monopoly, and that hinges on the definition of the "market". That's a > different can of worms for a different part of this thread.
The trial court determined and two different appeals courts upheld that MS had an illegal monopoly. I think they have more experience and knowledge of these things than you do. MS's illegal monopoly is an established legal fact regardless of your irrelevant opinion. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
