In comp.os.linux.misc David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, both a finding of "yes, Microsoft had a monopoly" and a > finding of "no, Microsoft did not have a monopoly" would both have been > within the trial court's discretion.
Well, of course, and they said YES (as a finding of fact). > They could just as easily have found > that Linux, OSX, FreeBSD, and other operating systems competed with Windows. It would have been irrelevant. > To call it an "established legal fact" is to grossly distort the > circumstances under which it was determined and upheld. Uh, it's an established legal fact. So I think your logic is off there. Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
