Not Bill Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
>> Not Bill Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
>> >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:35:47 +0000, Not Bill Gates wrote:
>> >> > Heck, I dunno. Like you, I don't even really care all that much.
>> >> You don't care that innovation in desktop software has been crippled by
>> >> the actions of the monopoly player Microsoft?
>> > You need to first prove innovation in desktop software has been
>> > crippled, don't you?
>>
>> MS took desktop software through pretty much the same sequence of
>> offerings that the mainframe and minicomputer software industry had
>> been throgh: flat file systems and single-tasking OS's in a command
>> line environment, adding nested file systems, adding TSRs, adding a
>> windowing environment, adding true multitasking and finally
>> multiprocessor systems. This took them what - 20+ years?
>
> <shrug> Being pissed off about how things could have been done
> better is a losing proposition.
I'm not pissed off about it - I've got better things to do. You asked
for prove that desktop software development was crippled by MS. I
provided it.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
