On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 01:54:14 -0700, "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote or quoted :
> They have obligations to their clients because (and only because) >failure to provide the services they contract to provide will result in >lawsuits and harm to the shareholders. All other obligations come from the >harm these failures will do to the shareholders. That's the view of Republican, but it is not the only view. Some might say the law trumps that. It does not matter if breaking the law would be more profitable, you still don't do it. -- Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green. http://mindprod.com Again taking new Java programming contracts. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
