On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 at 16:35, Dan Stromberg <drsali...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 3:15 PM Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> But ultimately, that's still the same as sum(), and it's no more >> readable than chain(), so I'd still be inclined to go with chain and >> then wrap it in a function if you need the clarity. > > > "Need" the clarity? Please tell me you don't think clarity is for the feeble > minded. >
It's more about whether you consider that list(chain(...)) is a clear and readable idiom, or you prefer to give a name to it. Not every two-operation action needs its own name. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
