On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 4:20 PM <pyt...@blackward.eu> wrote: > > Chris, > > you seem to imply, that I have compiled said versions without reason and > that the same would be possible on basis of Python 3 - which is simply > not true. Maybe you are not enough acquainted with Qt and belonging > libraries alike PyQtGraph. Maybe you are just not willing to see / > accept these arguments. > > By the way, some months ago I started trying to migrate to Python 3 and > gave up in favor of creating said compilation. Compatibility of Python > and its Packages decreased with V3 significantly. A whole lot of minor > and major incompatibilities between your subversions and belonging > packages. This was one reason, why Java took the route to its own death.
FUD. Lots and lots of FUD. More reasons to not promote your distribution. Use it if you will, but it doesn't merit any further visibility. > With a view to the mid and long term future, this discussion even gives > me cause to ponder about whether it doesn't make more sense to rely more > on C# and WinForms for professional projects from now on. I am fluent in > both too and it always makes sense to bet on the right horse at an early > stage. If you prefer, go for it. Everyone claims that it's easier to move to <some other language> rather than to migrate to Python 3, and I'm calling people's bluffs now. Go ahead and move to another language if it's easier - it's no skin off my nose. Or maybe it isn't easier, and that's just an empty argument. Funny how it keeps coming up. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
