OK. You are right. I was misleading. I am sorry for wasting your time.
Thanks you for helping me to express myself. Stephen. <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 7:05 PM Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 09:34:35 +0000, Stephen Tucker <stephen_tuc...@sil.org > > > declaimed the following: > > > > >*All: *For the record, I meant that the tuples are all the same. The > > > "all the same" is still ambiguous... > > >>> str1 = "A String" > >>> str2 = "Another String" > >>> str3 = "A" + " " + "String" > >>> id(str1), id(str2), id(str3) > (105461360, 105461296, 105461232) > >>> tpl1 = (str1, str2) > >>> tpl2 = (str1, str2) > >>> tpl3 = (str3, str2) > >>> id(tpl1), id(tpl2), id(tpl3) > (90094216, 90094152, 90093576) > >>> tpl1 == tpl2 > True > >>> tpl1 == tpl3 > True > >>> tpl4 = tpl3 > >>> tpl4 == tpl3 > True > >>> tpl1 is tpl2 > False > >>> tpl1 is tpl3 > False > >>> tpl1 is tpl4 > False > >>> tpl3 is tpl4 > True > >>> > > tpl3 IS THE SAME as tpl4 > tpl1 is NOT THE SAME as tpl2, tpl3, or tpl4 > > However, the CONTENTS of tpl4 compare as equivalent to tpl1, tpl2, and tpl3 > > > -- > Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN > wlfr...@ix.netcom.com > http://wlfraed.microdiversity.freeddns.org/ > > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
