Chris, > Yes, we know exactly how that's solved,
Nice. > but you specifically said you weren't interested in learning. Try taking a few courses of "understanding what you read". That is /not/ what I said. Though it goes in par with your amadant "you're wrong" chanting, even if there is at least one Python implementation in which it is. And you have been referred to here as being /the/ Python man, which makes it unlikely that you didn't know. :-( Besides, if I would /not/ have wanted to learn, would I have put this much effort in trying to clarify my stance and create examples for it ? > In fact, the solution was posted very early in this thread. My apologies, I must have missed it. Both that solution not having been relevant at that time as well as me-as-a-newbie not recognisning it for what it was could have played a role in it.. Can you quote at least a specific part of it ? That way I can perhaps find it back and read it. > I think it's high time we all stopped feeding the troll. And I think its high time you take up a few courses of what it means to be teacher to newbies. You seem to have lost the capability to put yourself into their shoes. Regards, Rudy Wieser -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list