On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 5:32 AM Alexey Muranov <alexey.mura...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On ven., Mar 29, 2019 at 4:51 PM, python-list-requ...@python.org wrote: > > > > There could perhaps be a special case for lambda expressions such > > that, > > when they are directly assigned to a variable, Python would use the > > variable name as the function name. I expect this could be > > accomplished by > > a straightforward transformation of the AST, perhaps even by just > > replacing > > the assignment with a def statement. > > If this will happen, that is, if in Python assigning a lambda-defined > function to a variable will mutate the function's attributes, or else, > if is some "random" syntactically-determined cases > > f = ... > > will stop being the same as evaluating the right-hand side and > assigning the result to "f" variable, it will be a fairly good extra > reason for me to go away from Python. > Is there a particular reason you don't like this? It's not too different from the syntactic magic Python already employs to support the 0-argument form of super(). -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
