On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 7:29 AM Alexey Muranov <alexey.mura...@gmail.com> wrote: > My idea however was to have it as an exact synonyme of an assignment of > a lambda. Assignment is an assignment, it should not modify the > attributs of the value that is being assigned.
Assigning lambda functions to names generally shouldn't be done. Just use def. You're asking for another way to do a bad thing that has a better alternative. There have periodically been proposals for the opposite, which would take care of some of the alternatives: def op["double"](x): return x * x This kind of proposal has its own issues, but I think it has a much better chance of being accepted than a way of creating and assigning lambda functions. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
