Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 22:14:22 +0100, Chris Green <c...@isbd.net> declaimed the > following: > > >Anders Wegge Keller <we...@wegge.dk> wrote: > >> > >> If your update frequency is low enough that it wont kill the filesystem > >> and > >> the amount of data is reasonably small, atomic writes to a file is easy to > >> work with: > >> > >Yes, I think you're right, using a file would seem to be the best > >answer. Sample rate is only one a second or slower and there's not a > >huge amount of data involved. > > > > If the data is small enough, putting the file into the small shared > memory (forget if that is /dev/shm or /run/shm on the BBB) would even avoid > wearing out eMMC/SD card. > That is also a very good idea, there's /dev/shm and /run on my BBB, /dev/shm seems to have more space.
-- Chris Green ยท -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
