Anders Wegge Keller <we...@wegge.dk> wrote: > På Sat, 21 Jul 2018 09:07:23 +0100 > Chris Green <c...@isbd.net> skrev: > > > So - what's the best approach to this? I've done some searching and > > most/many of the solutions seem rather heavyweight for my needs. Am I > > overlooking something obvious or should I try rethinking the original > > requirement and look for another approach? > > What do you consider heavyweight? Number of dependencies, memory footprint, > amount of code or a fourth thing? Also, which platform will the code > eventually run on? > > If your update frequency is low enough that it wont kill the filesystem and > the amount of data is reasonably small, atomic writes to a file is easy to > work with: > Yes, I think you're right, using a file would seem to be the best answer. Sample rate is only one a second or slower and there's not a huge amount of data involved.
Thanks. -- Chris Green · -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
