On 11/24/2017 9:05 PM, namenobodywa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, November 24, 2017 at 12:13:18 PM UTC-8, Terry Reedy wrote:
Since you did not start with tests or write tests as you wrote code, ...
that I could tell ...
I agree that I should have stuck in a qualifier, such as 'apparently'.
why on earth would you assume that?
I inferred (not assumed) that because
a) people routinely post code here and on Stackoverflow without
including or mentioning runnable automated tests;
b) you said 'here it is' without a word about tests;
c) your code has no docstrings or other function by function doc, and
one can hardly write tests without them.
Was I right or are you exceptional?
instantiate "window" and you'll see it works exactly as i intended;
I did, and it looks buggy to me. The top and left frame lines are
missing. If I click a square, the bottom square in the column lights
up. But then I have no idea whether those are your intentions or not.
nobody's asking you to debug code for free; i'm looking for the kind of
feedback the other respondent gave.
I read Chris's answer and intentionally did not repeat. Anyway, I think
the best advice I could give you, based on experience writing and
reviewing code, if you do not already have complete coverage, is to
write (more?) automated tests.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
