On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Mikhail V <mikhail...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I see you manually 'optimise' the look?
>> I personally would end with something like this:
>>
>> def zip_longest(*A, **K):
>> value = K.get ('fillvalue')
>> count = len(a) - 1
>> def sentinel():
>> nonlocal count
>> if not count:
>> raise ZipExhausted
>> count -= 1
>> yield value
>> fillers = repeat (value)
>> iterators = [chain (it, sentinel(), fillers) for it in A]
>> try:
>> while iterators:
>> yield tuple (map (next, iterators))
>> except ZipExhausted:
>> pass
>>
>>
>> So I would say, my option would be something inbetween.
>> Note that I tweaked it for proportional font, namely Times New Roman.
> I don't see how the font applies here, but whatever.
For a different font, say CourierNew (monospaced) the tweaking strategy might
be different.
> Which is better? The one-letter names or the longer ones that tie in with
> what they're
> doing?
I think I have answered more or less in previous post, that you cutted off.
So you were not satisfied?
But now I am probably not get your 'better' meaning.
Better for understanding, or purely visually, i.e. less eye-straining?
> Also, why do you have those loose spaces stuck in random places, eg
> before some of the open parentheses but not others?
Is it not allowed? I like how it looks with Times font.
Mikhail
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
